A Machine Learning Approach for Classifying Rheological Behavior and Stability of Polymer Solutions Using a Naive Bayes Classifier

Release :
2026/08/09
Language :
en
Year :
2026
Issue :
Vol. 1 / Issue 1
Pages :
14-20
Download Count
94

Authors:

  • SE
    Safa Enes Türkoğlu(corresponding author)ID
    Computer Engineering, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat, Türkiye
  • GA
    Gülistan Akkaya SelçinID
    Electric and Energy, OIZ Vocational School, Bitlis Eren University, Bitlis, Türkiye

Abstract:

The rheological characterization of polymer solutions is critical for optimizing their performance in various industrial applications, including enhanced oil recovery, food processing, and biomedical engineering. Traditional experimental methods for classifying flow behavior, viscosity, shear-thinning degree, and system stability are often time-consuming and require expert interpretation. This study presents a data-driven approach to automate these classifications using a Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB) classifier. A comprehensive dataset comprising 420 experimental measurements of polymer solutions, sourced from Kaggle, was used. The dataset includes key physicochemical features: shear rate, polymer concentration, NaCl concentration, Ca²⁺ concentration, temperature, and logarithmic viscosity. These features were used to predict four distinct target labels: Newtonian vs. Non-Newtonian flow behavior, Shear Thinning Degree, Viscosity Class, and System Stability. The GNB model, chosen for its suitability with continuous features and probabilistic foundation, was trained and evaluated using an 80/20 train-test split and 5-fold cross-validation. The model achieved high test accuracies of 0.857 (Flow Behavior), 0.798 (Shear Thinning Degree), 1.000 (System Stability), and 0.940 (Viscosity Class). Cross-validation scores confirmed model robustness. Permutation feature importance analysis revealed that the slope of the log(viscosity) vs. log(shear rate) relationship, temperature, and Ca²⁺ concentration were the most influential features across all classification tasks. This study demonstrates the efficacy of simple yet interpretable machine learning models in accurately predicting complex rheological properties from basic formulation parameters, paving the way for rapid, low-cost material screening and process optimization.
Download Full Article (PDF)
Complete research paper with figures, tables, and references
Download PDF
1Atabek Savaş, L., Y. Uzunoğlu, and S. Savaş, 2022 Kemik külü ve uyumlaştırıcının pp/pa6 matrisli kompozitlerin mekanik Özellikleri Üzerine etkisi. International Journal of Innovative Engineering Applications 6: 118–128.
2Barnes, H. A., J. F. Hutton, and K. Walters, 1989 Volume 3: An Introduction to Rheology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
3Belkhir, S. A., A. A. Pakeer, M. Shakeel, et al., 2026 Comparative assessment of machine learning models for polymer solution viscosity prediction in enhanced oil recovery. Scientific Reports 16: 10442.
4Bezdek, J. C., 1981 Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms. Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA.
5Bird, R. B., R. C. Armstrong, and O. Hassager, 1987 Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids, Volume 1: Fluid Mechanics. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, USA, second edition.
6Breiman, L., 2001 Random forests. Machine Learning 45: 5–32.
7Chawla, N. V., 2009 Data mining for imbalanced datasets: An overview. In Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook, edited by O. Maimon and L. Rokach, pp. 875–886, Springer, Boston, MA, USA.
8Dealy, J. M. and K. F. Wissbrun, 1999 Melt Rheology and Its Role in Plastics Processing: Theory and Applications. Springer, Boston, MA, USA.
9Flory, P. J., 1953 Principles of Polymer Chemistry. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, USA.
10Green, M. L., 2019 Machine learning for materials science: A new paradigm. MRS Bulletin 44: 89–94.
11Hansen, J.-P., C. I. Addison, and A. A. Louis, 2005 Polymer solutions: from hard monomers to soft polymers. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 17: S3185.
12Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman, 2009 The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Springer, New York, NY, USA, second edition.
13Jackson, A. J., D. P. Tabor, and M. A. Webb, 2023 Machine learning for rheology of polymer solutions. Macromolecules 56: 2668–2682.
14Kim, K., Y. Kang, and S. H. Im, 2021 Machine learning for predicting the glass transition temperature of polymers. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 61: 657–669.
15Kotsiantis, S. B., D. Kanellopoulos, and P. E. Pintelas, 2006 Data preprocessing for supervised learning. International Journal of Computer Science 1: 111–117.
16Macosko, C. W., 1994 Rheology: Principles, Measurements, and Applications. VCH Publishers, New York, NY, USA.
17Mezger, T. G., 2014 The Rheology Handbook: For Users of Rotational and Oscillatory Rheometers. Vincentz Network, Hannover, Germany, fourth edition.
18Park, S. Y., J. H. Park, and S. H. Lee, 2021 Prediction of polymer viscosity using machine learning. Journal of Polymer Engineering 41: 535–544.
19Pedregosa, F. et al., 2011 Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12: 2825–2830.
20Ramprasad, R., R. Batra, G. Pilania, A. Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, and C. Kim, 2017 Machine learning in materials informatics: Recent applications and prospects. npj Computational Materials 3: 54.
21Rudin, C., 2019 Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence 1: 206–215.
22Rutledge, G. C., 2019 Machine learning for polymer design. AIChE Journal 65: 1118–1124.
23Soares, I. F., M. C. K. de Oliveira, M. F. Naccache, and M. Nele, 2023 Effects of monovalent and divalent cations on the rheology of organic acid laden interfaces. Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology 44: 1389–1401.
24Verma, A., 2023 Polymer dataset. Kaggle. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/akverma9/polymer-dataset
25Wang, Y., H. Li, and D. Wang, 2020 The role of ca2+ in the conformational transition of polyelectrolytes. Soft Matter 16: 4385–4393.
26Wei, J., X. Chu, X. Y. Sun, K. Xu, et al., 2019 Machine learning in materials science. InfoMat 1: 338–358.
27Wever, D. A. Z., F. Picchioni, and A. A. Broekhuis, 2011 Polymers for enhanced oil recovery: A paradigm for structure-property relationship in aqueous solution. Progress in Polymer Science 36: 1558–1628.

ADBA Assistant

Always on

Quick questions:

Powered by ADBA Scientific AI