Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Computational Materials Science: Mapping the Landscape of CALPHAD-Based Design

Release :
2026/08/02
Language :
en
Year :
2026
Issue :
Vol. 1 / Issue 1
Pages :
1-8
Download Count
75

Authors:

  • ME
    Muhammed Enes İlgaziID
    Mechanical and Metal Technologies, OIZ Vocational School, Bitlis Eren University, Bitlis, Türkiye

Abstract:

Efficient irrigation scheduling is a central challenge in precision agriculture because crop water demand varies with soil properties, climate conditions, growth stage, season, irrigation method, water source, and regional characteristics. This study presents a genetic algorithm-based smart irrigation optimization model that produces operational irrigation recommendations rather than only classifying irrigation need. The model uses an irrigation data set containing 10,000 complete records and 20 variables grouped into soil conditions, weather conditions, agricultural information, and irrigation history. Each candidate irrigation plan is represented as an eight-gene chromosome covering irrigation amount, frequency, time, duration, irrigation type, water source, mulching status, and regional adjustment coefficient. A compound fitness function evaluates candidate plans by combining water adequacy, timing suitability, frequency suitability, duration consistency, method efficiency, source suitability, mulching contribution, regional calibration, soil quality, and excessive water penalty. The evolutionary process uses tournament selection, two-point crossover, adaptive mutation, and elitism. Experimental results show that the population improves across generations and converges toward an interpretable irrigation schedule. The best plan reached a fitness value of 830.2539 in generation 149 and recommended 10.77 mm of water every five days at 18:00 for 14.83 minutes using drip irrigation, rainwater, mulching, and a regional coefficient of 0.91. The results indicate that genetic algorithms can provide a transparent and flexible decision-support structure for smart irrigation planning when multiple agronomic and operational variables must be considered together.
Download Full Article (PDF)
Complete research paper with figures, tables, and references
Download PDF
1Akter, Z., D. B. Dipu, P. Nag, M. M. Molla, and G. Saha, 2026 Thermo-hydraulic optimization of hybrid nanocoolant flow in ribbed microchannels using cfd-enhanced machine learning with explainable analysis. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 81: 107968.
2Alaca, Y., Y. Uzunoğlu, and B. Emin, 2025 Investigation of the effect of alloying elements on the density of titanium-based biomedical materials using explainable artificial intelligence. Computational and Electronic Medicine 2: 15–19.
3Andersson, J.-O., T. Helander, L. Höglund, P. Shi, and B. Sundman, 2002 Thermo-calc & dictra, computational tools for materials science. CALPHAD 26: 273–312.
4Ansari, S. S., S. M. Ibrahim, S. D. Hasan, and A. U. Rehman, 2025 Experiments and predictive modelling on sustainable cementitious mortar with perforated fly ash cenospheres and effectively dispersed nano silica. Materials Today Communications 47: 113020.
5Barnard, A. S., 2022 Explainable prediction of n-v-related defects in nanodiamond using neural networks and shapley values. Cell Reports Physical Science 3: 100696.
6Bordekar, H., J. Koord, O. Volkernik, and C. Huhne, 2026 Microstructure characterization of fiber composite laminate using explainable artificial intelligence. Journal of Composite Materials 60: 3–25.
7Emin, B., Y. Uzunoğlu, and Y. Alaca, 2025 Investigation of the impact of alloying elements on the mechanical properties of superalloys using explainable artificial intelligence. Chaos Fractals 2: 20–27.
8Frie, C., A. R. Durmaz, and C. Eberl, 2024 Exploration of materials fatigue influence factors using interpretable machine learning. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures 47: 2752–2773.
9Jeon, J. et al., 2022 Prediction and mechanism explain of austenite-grain growth during reheating of alloy steel using xai. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 21: 1408–1418.
10Lee, K. and P. V. Balachandran, 2022 Explainable artificial intelligence approach for yield strength prediction in as-cast multi-principal element alloys. Materialia 26: 101628.
11Lundberg, S. M. and S.-I. Lee, 2017 A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 4765–4774.
12Matin, M., A. Dehghanian, A. H. Zeinaddini, and H. Darijani, 2025 Interpretable machine learning modeling of temperature rise in a medium voltage switchgear using multiphysics cfd analysis. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 65: 105585.
13Park, S. et al., 2022 High strength aluminum alloys design via explainable artificial intelligence. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 903: 163828.
14Ravi, S. K. et al., 2023 Elucidating precipitation in fecral alloys through explainable ai: A case study. Computational Materials Science 230: 112440.
15Ribeiro, M. T., S. Singh, and C. Guestrin, 2016 Why should i trust you? explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1135–1144.
16Saberi, S., H. Nasiri, O. Ghorbani, M. I. Friswell, and S. G. P. Castro, 2023 Explainable artificial intelligence to investigate the contribution of design variables to the static characteristics of bistable composite laminates. Materials 16: 5381.
17Saunders, N., U. K. Z. Guo, X. Li, A. P. Miodownik, and J.-P. Schillé, 2003 Using jmatpro to model materials properties and behavior. JOM 55: 60–65.
18Turkoğlu, S. E. and Y. Uzunoğlu, 2025 Interpretable machine learning and genetic algorithm-based optimization of ultimate tensile strength and melting completion in alloys. Advanced Materials Science 25: 86.
19Uzunoglu, Y. and Y. Alaca, 2025 High-accuracy prediction of the thermo-physical properties of 6xxx series aluminum alloys using explainable artificial intelligence. International Journal of Computational Materials Science and Engineering Early access.
20Uzunoğlu, Y. and Y. Alaca, 2025 Inverse prediction of the calphad-modeled physical properties of superalloys using explainable artificial intelligence and artificial neural networks. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 14: 331–347.
21Uzunoğlu, Y., Y. Alaca, Ö. Özdilli, and S. Şevik, 2026 Development and simulation analysis of a novel aluminum alloy for heat sink applications using explainable artificial intelligence and the calphad method. Applied Thermal Engineering 296: 130810.
22van Eck, N. J. and L. Waltman, 2009 How to normalize cooccurrence data? an analysis of some well-known similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60: 1635–1651.
23van Eck, N. J. and L. Waltman, 2023 VOSviewer manual. Universiteit Leiden, Version 1.6.20.
24Yeung, C., J.-M. Tsai, B. King, Y. Kawagoe, D. Ho, et al., 2020 Elucidating the behavior of nanophotonic structures through explainable machine learning algorithms. ACS Photonics 7: 2309–2318.
25Yossef, M., M. Noureldin, and A. Alqabbany, 2024 Explainable artificial intelligence framework for frp composites design. Composite Structures 341: 118190.

ADBA Assistant

Always on

Quick questions:

Powered by ADBA Scientific AI